When it comes to Marxism vs statism there is no “better.” They’re two sides of the same coin and lead to the same result: Government control, loss of economic freedom. Tyranny. Totalitrarianism.
Look up Reagan on compulsory health insurance, statism, socialism, totalitarianism, etc, vs freedom.
How soon they forget.
Couple in Romney’s dismal liberal progressive record on abortionism, homosexualism, gun-control, liberal judges, advocating for TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending, etc, and there’s really very little difference between them and definitely no “better” there.
They are both tyrannical statists.
“They are both tyrannical statists.”
Amen to that. I might add, that I find Romney to be even scarier than Obama in many ways. Mr. Obama is an open evil that most persons of even moderate conservative views can clearly see - that which is recognized is easier to oppose. However, Romney is truly a wolf in sheep’s clothing and his evil is not so clearly seen, even by persons that should. That really scares me.
I really can understand raw fear many have of 4 more years of Obama, and thus their choice to take a lesser (as they perceive it) evil in Romney. So, I don’t get upset with an ABO position per se. However, when they go so far as to suggest that anyone who doesn’t agree to their ABO strategy is “stupid”, “supporting Obama”, etc. then I get mad.
Couple in Romney’s dismal liberal progressive record on abortionism, homosexualism, gun-control, liberal judges, advocating for TARP, bailouts, stimulus spending, etc, and there’s really very little difference between them and definitely no “better” there.
Been at this 35 years Jim and I still have only 1 choice in this election . You forget the public is being bought with every election in your list there .