Sure, it would have been nice to have the Supreme Court do the heavy lifting for us, but isn't that what liberals do? Let's get out there and retake control of our government, and vote this monstrosity out of existence. It's what our founding fathers would have wanted.
“The important thing at this point is that the commerce clause was crucially weakened by a 7-2 vote, and this would not have happened without Roberts.”
No, it wasn’t. The commerce clause ruling is not a binding precedent.
“Sure, it would have been nice to have the Supreme Court do the heavy lifting for us, but isn’t that what liberals do?”
No, the liberals want the Supreme Court to pass laws for them, we want the Supreme Court to strike down unconstitutional laws. There’s a world of difference.
Simply untrue!
Seven Justices never voted to weaken the commerce clause.
It's pure dicta and has no bearing on any future commerce clause cases.
[[The important thing at this point is that the commerce clause was crucially weakened by a 7-2 vote, and this would not have happened without Roberts.]]
No-
I’m sorry- that wasn’t the most important thing to come fro mthe ruling- Roberts has now given the democrats the ability to keep ‘reinstating’ obummercare when they regain the office and senate- even if a previous republican president repeals the law- they will simply just reinstate it- so we’ll have 4-8 years of our constitutional rights violated, and 4-8 years where the republicans come in and save us from an oppresive government IF they contriol the senate as well and get enough votes to repeal the unlawful law-
[[ Let’s get out there and retake control of our government,]]
We shouldn’t have to hope beyond hope that we can elect enouygh republicans to repeal an UNLAWFUL law- The supreme court should have upheld our constitution, and roberts FAILED to do so- He FAILED America, and forever opened up pandoras box (unless the issue can coem before the supreme court again in a new challenge- Lawyersw NEED to bring htis back before the supreme court to determien IF our government has a right to tax someoen AGAINST THEIR WILL (not yelling, just stressign key points brought out in my previous post) simply for existing- We as a coutnry have never ever doen htis because we for them ost part valued freedoms (to an extent)- roberts however opened up the door for congress and hte presidency to deny us this freedom as explaiend in my previosu post