[Toddsterpatriot]

Your calculations are in error by a factor of ~20.

LOL!

[Wonder Warthog]

Not only a troll, but a juvenile troll at that. Your whole exercise is looking for an excuse to scream "gotcha".

Here's one last try to get through your idiocy......

You're beating a strawman. The question isn't whether a specific chemical contains enough energy to do a "fake", it is whether that chemical could have plausibly been used to do a fake in a specific set of circumstances.

In the case of the specific experiment you're trying to calculate for, the answer is no. I've told you that, Kevmo has told you that. Repeatedly.

Consider an LENR system that only puts out a watt or two. Obviously some chemicals (and probably many) can put out that much energy. So the real question is "could that/those chemicals plausibly be part of the specific system being examined". But when that system runs for months on end (see the demo at MIT), even though putting out only a few watts, it eventually reaches an output that no chemical system could have produced IN THAT SPECIFIC DEVICE.