Did you miss the first line in my post?
16 kWh=16kJ/sec
I don't care how many hours it ran, I just wanted to see how much "excess energy" was produced per second.
Now, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you actually intended to type KW instead of KWH,
I thought 1 kW was 1 kJ/sec? If you want to divide 233 kWh by 57600 seconds, you'll see the H2O2 needed is even less.
Your choice of experiments was pretty much misleading, as this experiment is the ONLY one in which an H2O2 "fake" will work. I have to wonder if that choice was deliberate.
I asked you and Kevmo to provide me with the info for an experiment, any experiment. You both ran away.
Kevmo pointed me to a thread about possible fakes.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2730401/posts
The January 2011 had enough detail and it was the first one I saw. Are you sure it's the only one where H2O2 will work?
I think you will find that H2O2 WILL NOT WORK for the tank-fed experiments (4.9 g/s flow instead of 833 g/s, outputs of 12kW and 16kW respectively).
I didn't see that one in Kevmo's link. You have a link for those trials?
"16 kWh=16kJ/sec"
"I thought 1 kW was 1 kJ/sec?"
All of which proves that you don't know the difference between a KW and a KWH.
"I asked you and Kevmo to provide me with the info for an experiment, any experiment. You both ran away."
LOL. You've been on these threads a long time, and have been told repeatedly that all the experimnents and demos are available at LENR-CARN.org. What more information do you need.
"Are you sure it's the only one where H2O2 will work?"
Yes.
"I didn't see that one in Kevmo's link. You have a link for those trials?"
See above about LENR-CANR org.