Tell me how much “excess energy” was generated and I’ll tell you how much H2O2 was needed.
***You already did the enthalpy stuff, so why are you asking again? You blithely ignore that the input water was TESTED. It did not have H202 in it, it was simply water. So how is it you can produce that kind of excess heat with just water? You won’t answer this question, because the answer proves my point that the available energy from water alone is nowhere near enough to produce the excess heat observed. By orders of Magnitude. You know it, that’s why you keep avoiding it.
Because disproving your claim, "orders of magnitude more" was so easy.
You blithely ignore that the input water was TESTED.
Maybe you can show me where it was tested?
So how is it you can produce that kind of excess heat with just water?
Of course, if it was an honest test, you probably couldn't produce excess heat with just water. But that wasn't your claim. I'll try to help you remember.
Kevmo: Look at this, excess energy!
Seagull: Yeah, great, but Rossi is untrustworthy.
Kevmo:Doesn't matter, excess energy!
Seagull: He could've faked it.
Kevmo: Impossible, no fake would work, orders of magnitude more energy are produced than any possible chemical reaction. Not even rocket fuel has enough energy. This proves it couldn't be a fake!
Seagull: It could be a chemical reaction.
Kevmo: A new chemical reaction would be great, no NRC involvement.
Seagull: H2O2 decomposing isn't a new reaction. Not even when it's 0.196M.
Kevmo: No fair. When I said no possible chemical reaction, I didn't think anyone would actually prove me wrong with some simple high school chemistry.
LOL!
You should try to dilute your 3% H2O2 down to 0.196 M, (I'll help you, that would be less than 7 grams per 1000 mL of solution) and test the smell.