Replies

Your "simple calculations" aren't worth the electrons it took to generate them. In a word, they are "simplistic", as are your assumptions.

Simplistic? More simplistic than the claim that "The data on this phenomenon is very consistent — the heat generated is several orders of magnitude more than could be possible with any known chemical reaction"?

There have been several demonstrations, all well documented, and run at different power levels.

In case you forgot, I asked you "how much "excess" energy did he produce? He warmed how much water how many degrees?" You could provide the data for another test. Or you could run away again.

In particular, the overnight run done by Rossi and Levi, would require a far higher energy component and makes the introduction of such a component virtually impossible.

Component? You mean the hose pumping the H2O2? Or would he have to up the concentration to the 3% level? Yeah, that would be impossible to pull off.

Since you appear to be pretty ignorant of chemistry

I know, I mean just look at my enthalpy calculations. Just horrible.

But keep trying.....eventually you will actually learn something.

Chemicals with the energy density you're talking about are damned dangerous. Even peroxide, at the strength needed, is liable to "undergo dangerous transitions". We're not talking about the stuff in your medicine cabinet, which is diluted, but at a concentration well above 90%.

Hilarious!

"In case you forgot, I asked you "how much "excess" energy did he produce? He warmed how much water how many degrees?" You could provide the data for another test. Or you could run away again."

If you'd read the damned reports, you would know this. Kevmo is right.....you haven't done your homework. You skeptopaths are all alike....won't ever actually read the involved science for yourselves, but want other people to do so and provide you with a digest of some sort. The data is there. Look it up yourself.