All that extra oxygen. Awful!
Perhaps they’re all just too LAZY to do the homework?
Perhaps you shouldn't mention homework?
Have you ever smelled a bottle of H202? It smells different than water.
There was some discussion on this at Vortex. Here’s a sample
On 11-06-21 06:12 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
hello,
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Hydrogen peroxide, H2O2, is a substance that can be dissolved in water
with any concentration. It can easily be catalyzed to decompose into
water, oxygen and 0,196 MJ of heat per mol. ....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is a good reminder how easy it is to fake up such a short black
box demonstrations. Really all you need is some cleverly hidden power
source. That H2O2 is good example of variety of possible methods how
to fake this thing, if that is the purpose. Right now, there is only
word from about a dozen people, who has the first hand knowledge. But
it is just a word. Although I think that faking a word is far more
difficult than faking a demonstration.
This is very much of the reason why I am very much of disappointed on
this steam issue discussion, because it fails to see the point of
demonstrations. People seem to fail completely to realize, that there
are far more easy ways to fake up demonstrations. And there are dozens
of them! This steam faking is not among them, because as it is clearly
shown by rossi and levi, criticism just fails in the very basics. Like
everyone can see when they are boiling water in the kettle.
Jouni: Horse pucky. There is nothing at all which was “clearly shown” about the steam in the experiments done by Rossi, Levi, and Galantini.
And as discussed at length on this list, if the big Cat was actually putting out 15 kW of power, it would have been very difficult to fake it. There are certainly not “dozens” of “easy” ways to fake it. You don’t get that kind of energy by simple stuff like pre-warming the boiler, or stuffing it with gasoline and platinum! A fake is only plausible if the *actual* excess power was much smaller than what was claimed.