Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

I thought we already had clot buster shots? I remember being in the ER with a P.E. and that being suggested and that was back in 2003. They went with Heparin instead.


8 posted on 07/06/2012 11:30:44 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big. Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: My Favorite Headache

Funny - I was getting ready to ping you to this thread.


9 posted on 07/07/2012 12:28:17 AM PDT by AAABEST (Et lux in tenebris lucet: et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache

tpa has been in use for quite a while. But making it
go to the area of a clot is unique. Still they haven’t
tested the product in humans...who knows how the particles
will behave in human blood, suppose they themselves clump
up? And who knows if they will migrate to other areas
beside areas with clots, and cause problems there?

Still, looks promising.


10 posted on 07/07/2012 3:05:35 AM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: My Favorite Headache
I thought we already had clot buster shots?

We do, and the article discusses them. The problem is that since they aren't targeted, doctors need to use larger doses but that can cause bleeding. This new stuff finds the clot and works on it alone.

11 posted on 07/07/2012 4:42:50 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson