Here's a question:
Is the right to legislate over the royal property in any way "fundamental right"? I don't think the Liechtenstein subjects would like the Parliament to legislate over their property.
Observe that the tangible issue before them is abortion. Evidently three in every four Liechtensteinians consider the royal veto as something that protects their rights and those of their children against the Parliament.
The monarchist sentiment is growing: in 2003 the country passed a new constitution strengthening the monarchy with 64% of the vote. Now it is 76% in favor of this key constitutional provision.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.