Posted on 07/05/2012 2:05:29 PM PDT by Joe27
Mitt Romney reportedly raised more than $100 million in June, the best fundraising month of his campaign so far.
Politico's Mike Allen first reported the total, which includes contributions to both Romney's campaign and the Romney Victory Funda joint account between the Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee. A Romney spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
That's two record-breaking months in a row for the Romney team. In May, the presumptive Republican nominee raised nearly $77 millionalmost $17 million more than President Barack Obama's re-election campaign. The Obama campaign has not yet announced its June totals.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Socialist? I don’t think so. Ripon Republican or Democrat circa 1965? Perhaps. I’ll take those over someone PROVEN to hate AmeriKKKa, her constitution, white people, the military and freedom. The grown-ups here know we only have two choices in November: A RINO/squish/centrist or an illegal Marxist amnesty-signing, budget-busting, blame America, black panther and SEIU coddling radical who in four years has almost destroyed our country. Anyone voting for you or any other third party candidate is throwing away a right paid for with the blood of millions of patriots.
I guess you missed that socialized medicine thing in Massachusetts.
Those are pretty big rhetorical guns.
Those patriots swore an oath before God to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, did they not?
A document that says:
"A well regulated Militia, being NECESSARY to the security of a free State, the RIGHT of the people to keep and bear Arms, SHALL NOT be infringed."
And yet, your candidate, Mitt Romney, signed into law a permanent ban on the exact sort of weapons the Second Amendment is referring to, and in fact the exact sort of weapons that the British went to Concord and Lexington to try and confiscate from Americans.
On the day that Mitt Romney signed that unconstitutional, un-American monstrosity into law he said this:
"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."
So, tell me, just who is that is "throwing away rights"?
By the way, if you’re really a “2ndDivisionVet,” did you not take that same oath to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic?
Can you explain to me how someone who blatantly violates the Second Amendment should not be identified as a domestic enemy of the Constitution?
Is there an expiration date on the oath?
Where was this filmed? Or was it “shopped?”
No, I just picked that name out of a hat. It sounded better than “Trix Rabbit” or “Betty Boop” so I went with it.
Best thing Ive done lately is to block the loading of every single one of your spam images.
Would you be so kind as to share how that was done? I’d love to block certain posters and not have to see their repeated crap but FR doesn’t have an ignore function.
Thanks.
The U.S. Constitution guarantees to each of the States a republican form of government.
Can you explain to me how socialistic, statist control over every aspect of life can possibly be compatible with republican self-government?
Well, whether or not you swore the oath, Mitt Romney did.
And he breached it in some of the worst ways imaginable.
Ever recite the Pledge of Allegiance?
Staes Rights - 10th Amendment - “Those powers not delegated to the United States (Obamacare) by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States (Romneycare) are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
All I have to do is right click on the image and select "Adblock Plus: block image". Then a window like this opens:
You can select just the image, or all the images in that folder (the default selection), or all images at that domain name. Click on "Add Filter", and you're done.
Refresh the page, and the image will be gone.
Unfortunately, I know of no way to block individual posters on FR.
The Pledge of Allegiance? Seriously? You’re a so-called conservative candidate for the presidency and you don’t know that that pledge was written by a socialist? Huh?
What’s Conservative about the Pledge of Allegiance?
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/whats-conservative-about-pledge-allegiance
But we already have a Pledge of Allegiance written by a socialist
http://www.rjkoehler.com/2011/03/30/but-we-already-have-a-pledge-of-allegiance-written-by-socialists/
Thanks a million. I have firefox as an option. I’ll have to give it a look. FR doesn’t have ignore feature but it would be nice.
Somethingg like this?
Oh, okay. You have a screen name that says you’re a vet, but now you say you’re not. And you’ve never recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
Got it.
Fine. Go support the oath-breaking pro-choice democrat socialist gun-banner from Massachusetts. There’s nothing I can do about it, obviously.
No, I knew who wrote it. And I still agree with every word of it. You don’t? Which parts don’t you like?
I also knew you were a vet, and were being sarcastic.
So, how do you square the keeping of your oath with support for a man who has demonstrated over and over again that he won’t keep his own sacred oath to support the Constitution?
As opposed to supporting the Kenyan Marxist through inaction? You Mitt-haters are such a joke.
I’m never inactive. You’re mistaken.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.