Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Andy from Chapel Hill

Didn’t Petraeus describe himself as a ‘Rockefeller Republican’ or something similar?

There’s nothing in a military man resume suggestive of small-government instincts.


15 posted on 07/05/2012 9:55:34 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker
There’s nothing in a military man resume suggestive of small-government instincts.

I recently read the new biography of Eisenhower by Jean Edward Smith. I think the experience of being a general in the U.S. military lends itself well to the presidency. Especially in Petraeus' case, as like Eisenhower, he had to manage a coalition of allies during a period of war, not to mention all the internal politics of being that high up the command structure. Leadership, ability to delegate and to choose the right people that can get the job done are all abilities we desperately need in the White House right now.

25 posted on 07/05/2012 10:06:22 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker

Presidents and Vice Presidents do not spend the people’s money — Congress does. This is why I would prefer that Ryan stay in the House and eventually replace Boehner.

The world began to tip over when Pelosi and Reid assumed control of Congress and Bush failed to veto everything they did.


27 posted on 07/05/2012 10:09:43 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson