I’m no attorney nor am I a constitutional scholar so I rely on my instincts and put my trust in certain people. Mark Levin says it’s “destructive to our republic” and “damaged the constitution severely”. After his “laymen terms” explanation last week, I’m satisfied with my understanding and would rather not live life with rose colored glasses.
I don’t necessarily disagree with Levin’s interpretation. But, if your only source of critical logic is Mark Levin, if I were you, I would strive to expand my horizons.