Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema

I’m surprised he didn’t do it in Ebonics.


5 posted on 07/04/2012 6:17:37 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Did he actually do it today?

And did he say "inalienable" or "unalienable"?

6 posted on 07/04/2012 6:21:51 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Aint no thang. Muthasucka done played hisself a foo'.

Fo shizzle homedawg. Peace.

19 posted on 07/04/2012 6:59:42 PM PDT by Copenhagen Smile (Ask me no questions, I"ll tell you no lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

I’m surprised he didn’t do it in Ebonics.


Or, Arabic.


64 posted on 07/05/2012 5:47:25 AM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the StatistI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Not ebonics, but not grammatically correct English, either:

“his own words: ‘all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights.’”


83 posted on 07/06/2012 2:01:14 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson