[OneWingedShark]

YES. It is likely that Republicans are going to be in charge of both houses of congress after the next election, even if the POTUS is a liberal Republican. And far more of these congressmen and senators will be REAL conservatives, not RINOs!

I'm sorry but I'm going to disagree; casting a vote for Romney is a signal to the Republican party that they can push whoever they want on us, this in turn will encourage them to push more RINOs on us. -- and let's quit using the term RINO, it's obvious that the true masqueraders are the Republicans that believe in a limited, responsible government. (look at the times that GW Bush was in office, and the Legislature was Republican-controlled; ask yourself what they did to reduce the size/scope of government, what they did to overturn Roe.v Wade, what they did to repeal GCA/NFA?) The republicans did not even put a token out there regarding Roe v. Wade, not even a resolution considering the USSC wrong and that the 5th Amd applies to the unborn.

[MHGinTN]

Both parties have used the slaughter of alive unborn Americans as an empowerment scheme: the democrats have demanded no restrictions on the slaughter, while the Republicans have used token opposition to the evil as a measn to fire up a duped base. We even have a man at FR running for president who has used the issue as his means to empower himself, by opposing any bill which would limit abortions in one way or another just because these efforts —in light of Roe v Wade being the law being— do not ban ALL abortions. I call it the all or nothing empowerment scheme where it is a given that what he demands is not going to happen because a law on the books is the means for both sides to exploit the evil.

[MHGinTN]

Both parties have used the slaughter of alive unborn Americans as an empowerment scheme: the democrats have demanded no restrictions on the slaughter, while the Republicans have used token opposition to the evil as a measn to fire up a duped base. We even have a man at FR running for president who has used the issue as his means to empower himself, by opposing any bill which would limit abortions in one way or another just because these efforts —in light of Roe v Wade being the law— do not ban ALL abortions. I call it the all or nothing empowerment scheme where it is a given that what he demands is not going to happen because a law on the books is the means for both sides to exploit the evil, so he is in effect sacrificing the children who could be saved because he isn’t getting all he demands.