Replies

“Why did you neglect to mention the meteoric rise of the non white population in Kali.”

Because California, from it’s earliest days, has had a signicant native Hispanic population, much of that as conservative as the rest of California prior to 1970.

Race has nothing to do with it as your question implies. Shame on you.

Since the late 1960’s when the emigration of east coaster, through Democrat Party politics, began to exert their influence on state governance, the rise of illegal immigration, hispanic, asian, and european has taken a huge jump.

San Francisco, home of east coaster (Maryland) Nancy Pelosi, declares itself to be a “sanctuary city” for illegals. Without the influence of east coast socialists much of this would not have occurred.

Los Angeles is the new Mexico City, just ask her Mayor Villarosa, promoted and lauded by east coast transplanted Democrats, who know how to keep the peasants on the farm.

The Democrats, never a force in California politics untill the great emmigrations of the 50’s and 60’s, use identity politics to maintain and increase their destructive power over California.

To them, using the illegal immigrant and related issues to influence and increase that power is OK. Mexico is a socialist country and it’s transplanted population, economic refugees, will all naturally vote, legally or not, for the socialists in the Democrat Party......all brought on and sanctoned by the east coast dominated California Democrat Party (and their east coast RINO Republican emmigrant friends.)

Ironically, Caesar Chavez, an icon of the left, hated the illegal immigrant, who he saw as a destablizing force undercutting his attempts to “organize” the farm worker.

Race has nothing to do with it as your question implies. Shame on you.

Oh what BS...the decline of California has everything to do with the rise of the latino population there

almost every minority flavor in America votes leftist...to claim the fact they are minority has nothing to do with it is wishful thinking for those who cannot handle the truth about how particular groups of people both behave a vote

I will ping two Cali freepers...one former...one current and ask them if the fact the latino population as a percentage in California has nearly doubled since 1990 is the major factor in why the state is now lost..and further...their continued rise nationwide bodes just as poorly if only by their voting stats alone

even with a poor candidate like McCain, white men in Kali voted nearly 50/50...49 to be exact

latino men voted mid 70s percentage for Obama

that would have killed us even by their 1990 population

GOP has lost Kali every major election since 1988

California, which rapidly gained population during the Gold Rush of 1848, joined the union in September, 1850 as part of the Compromise of 1850. With the exception of 1920 and 2010, the state has gained electoral votes from every census since its founding. In 1972, California reached 45 electoral votes, passing New York for most in the country. With 55 currently, the state has more than 10% of all available electoral votes. While growth in the Latino population has helped make California a reliably Democratic state today, this was not always the case. In fact, from 1952 through 1988, Republicans won every presidential election except the landslide loss of Barry Goldwater in 1964. In 2008, Barack Obama defeated John McCain by 61%-37%.

"Race has nothing to do with it as your question implies. Shame on you."

What utter, sanctimonious, head-in-the-sand mierda del toro.

Yeah, the immivasion has NADA que hacer to do with Cali's problemas. Nada!

Now, go ahead and call me a racist, because I believe my own reading of history, examination of current events around the world and life experience, and choose not to drink your multi-culti-uber-alles PC Koolaid.

Yawn.

(Try harder with a real argument next time. Your "Race Card" has expired.)