Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Roberts words are dicta.

For non-lawyers let me explain:

Dicta is an expression in a court's opinion that goes beyond the facts before the court and therefore are individual views of the author of the opinion and not binding in subsequent cases as legal precedent.

Anyone who claims that Roberts will restrain the use of the commerce clause is unaware of the legal meaning of dicta or they are flat out lying.

43 posted on 07/02/2012 5:54:00 PM PDT by CharacterCounts (A vote for the lesser of two evils only insures the triumph of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: CharacterCounts

o·bi·ter dictum (b-tr)
n. pl. obiter dicta
1. Law An opinion voiced by a judge that has only incidental bearing on the case in question and is therefore not binding. Also called dictum.
2. An incidental remark or observation; a passing comment.

In a few years—when half or more of our income is going to the federal government—he can say that he was misunderstood about his observations on the commerce clause. And then they take what’s left.


59 posted on 07/02/2012 6:12:29 PM PDT by tumblindice (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson