The N.Y. Times, and the Washington Post..!! Yeah, they are objective source's.
You basically said...all M.D.'s are to blame in the post I replied to.
It's apparent you have an agenda. Fair enough...and it's noted.
No, I said “MDs”, not “all MDs”. A lot of them. Enough of them to trigger radical changes in the practice of medicine.
It happened in the eearly ‘80s when a lot of people weren’t looking. There was so much froud waste and abuse, it couldn’t be put off any longer. But the measures taken were surface, even while being radical. Much more was needed and that’s why we’re in the position we are in now.
MDs are good, some of the best humanity has to offer. That’s obvious. They are in a system which thrives on illness and now on FWA.
If they would clean up shop we’d be in good shape. They won’t, partly due to their well-deserved rep of being very lousy administrators.
They’ve allowed OB to take over.
They have been deafeninlgly silent during all of this, and I recall their being very vociferous during the Hilllary take over. She shut them out of the proceedings, which gave them a notable “you are known by your enemies” presitge and it was gratifying.
They’ve, at least the AMA have, made the Faustian bargain that abortion is OK.
Everyone who makes that deal ends up destroyed.
That’s the only agenda apparent here.
They lose.
If they went back to healing people for a living it would work.
Too far gone, I imagine. Unless there are enough left who do something. There are some, and they’re the only ones we do business with. Military docs are among them - the best. They heal and cure for a living- and it’s not much of a living compared with their former classmates but they’ll be in and enviable position in no more than a couple of years if we’re silly enough to let this unreversible thing pass.