Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoFloFreeper
the texts of decisions are used as precedents. You can bet the “tax” argument, citing this decisioni, will be around for a long time.

On the Commerce Clause, this was not Cardozo speaking for the majority or a minority of four. It was Roberts speaking solely for himself, his own flight of fancy. He was not joined in his opinion on the Commerce Clause by any other Justice. As for treating the mandate as a tax; yes it is a precedent, and a harmful one.

120 posted on 07/01/2012 2:30:06 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Kennard

it also free the senate from the 60 person requirment to repeal.

it only takes 50 senators and a VP to repeal the ObamaTAX.


136 posted on 07/01/2012 2:41:55 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson