And JL, Romney's definition of "free market options" is best interpreted in the context of his recent statement that while he thinks homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to get married, they should have the "right" to adopt children (a euphemism for forcing adoption agencies to accommodate homosexuals). In Mass., Catholic adoption agencies closed their doors after 109 years rather than relinquish innocent children entrusted to them to such depraved social engineering. So Romney's "free market options" are probably about as squirelly and illogical as his saying that gays shouldn't be able to get married but SHOULD be able force adoption agencies to let them adopt kids.
Romney is bad news for everybody. ABOers' votes "against" Obama are equally votes FOR making liberals more powerful on both sides of the aisle. That is what ABO is voting FOR.
Those who vote ABR will be re-electing the Zero. No two ways about it. I wish things were different, but the facts state otherwise. We have a two party system, not three. If the Zero gets re-elected we’re not likely to ever get a third.
Those who think this is “hype” should ask themselves if they ever thought they would see the day that the biggest tax increase in the nation’s history would be shoved onto the American people with such a clear majority wanting nothing to do with it. Ask yourself if you ever thought you’d see the fed. government take over such large parts of our economy and ignore the Constitution whole-scale while doing exactly as they saw fit. Yes, we may have seen a few instances of this in recent Presidencies, but nothing like what has occurred in 3.5 years. Ask yourself that and then come back and tell me that Romney is still worse than the Zero. If you can do that, all evidence to the contrary, you truly are functioning in a different reality than the rest of us are.