Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45

Thing is, we don’t need luminaries to tell us Roberts’ ruling (yes, I call it RULing over us) was a slippery road, and sets precedence for the future forever.

We don’t need Roberts’ nuance and others to tell us there is some ‘good’ in this looming disaster.

I just don’t get it, IF I know ObamaCare was a monstrous bill against the consent of US, the people, why would some ones way smarter than me not understand there is nothing CONSTITUTIONal at all about it?


9 posted on 06/30/2012 8:44:12 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sir Napsalot

Roberts does know the law is unconstitutional, but it didn’t matter to him. His goal was to find a way to make the law stand in any way that he could, regardless of how ridiculous the legal logic was. He succeeded in the same way the OJ jury succeeded. He made a finding that made absolutely no sense given the information before him, because he could.


10 posted on 06/30/2012 8:52:41 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson