PING!
Florida law makes it easier for a voter to challenge candidate eligibility, so the usual nonsense of “no legal standing” will not fly here....unless the judge has been instructed to fix the case
Sad is that not only the liberal MSM will not cover it....but we have a lot of so-called “conservatives” who act as liberal as the MSM when it comes to Obama Eligibility. I swear you think a lot of the so-called “conservatives” are helping Obama win re-election
Um.... so like this was supposedly done yesterday?? Is there a follow-up or do I have to look for myself?
So the BIG question is what happened yesterday. I suppose I’ll have to go to Klayman’s site to see. Be right back kiddies!
Doesn’t matter at all.
If it goes to the Supreme Court, guess what...
Someday, someone is going to force him to prove he was eligible to sign this law.
Monckton tells Lords: Obama presidency at risk
From the report:
Attorneys for anyone accused of a criminal offence signed into statute by President Obama under Art. I, s. 7, have the right to request access by their forensic investigators to the Hawaii Health Department’s original birth record for Mr. Obama to satisfy them that the President is the President, the statute the statute and the alleged offence an offence. he suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process [14th Amdt.] where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment”. Therefore, the courts will be obliged to grant any such defence request. By the supremacy clause (Art. 6), Hawaii must comply.
By the precedent set in Brady v. Maryland (373 US 83, 1963), “T Does the issue matter? Advice from an eminent constitutional lawyer is that it does: “The Constitution is the supreme law of the US. We amend it, or we abide by it.” He expects a credible court challenge to the authenticity of Mr. Obama’s birth certificate soon. If it occurs, and if the certificate is a forgery, the constitutional consequences will be grave.
Standing, by virtue of direct, personal harm involved in a criminal indictment/conviction? What types of cases would this involve?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2900297/posts
Posted by Piffle on Fogblow:
“Based on Lying Larry's whine, it would appear that Hizzoner granted defendants’ motion to strike the amended complaint.
“Beyond that, I think we'll have to wait to see something from the court or a non-birther source to interpret Larry's screed. It seems likely that the court dismissed his operational complaint without prejudice. That's one possible explanation for why Larry believes he can refile along the lines of the amended complaint.”
Klayman is interpreted by Fogblowers as stating that he can re-file a completely new complaint including the claims rejected in the SAC, but Lewis would be unlikely to accept the claims. Lewis has not yet ruled on the Motion to Dismiss (MOT) the First Amended Complaint on which the earlier hearing was held, IIRC.
Paging Sheriff Arpaio, paging Sheriff Arpaio..
I would LOVE to see him off the ballot in Florida.
But it’s not going to happen.
He’s got too much tied up in voter fraud in that state.