Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gusopol3

This action is a gigantic wake up call. The majority of the country disagrees with Robert’s interpretation of this new law. Kagan shouldn’t have even been permitted to vote.


3 posted on 06/30/2012 6:18:19 AM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FreedBird

Taxation with Misrepresentation


5 posted on 06/30/2012 6:19:11 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FreedBird
Kagan shouldn’t have even been permitted to vote.

Which brings to mind Roberts' earlier, surprising defense of the justices' unquestioned integrity and professionalism in deciding whether or not to recuse themselves. It now looks like he was providing cover for Kagan to hear the Obamacare case.

13 posted on 06/30/2012 6:28:32 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: FreedBird

Confirming Kagan for the court revealed how useless the nomination process is without even mentioning Soto. The fact that Kagan was allowed to vote was an incredible obvious conflict yet it happened without challenge. The court now has the credibility of the stuff they called us in basic training i.e., sinks to the ocean floor.


59 posted on 06/30/2012 8:33:03 AM PDT by mcshot (God bless the USA! OMG PLEASE vote ABO or OWW and our Country dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson