[olezip]

Did Roberts originally vote to invalidate the mandate on commerce clause grounds, and to invalidate the Medicaid expansion, and then decide later to accept the tax argument and essentially rewrite the Medicaid expansion (which, as I noted, citing Jonathan Cohn, was the sleeper issue in this case) to preserve it?

Mike Savage pointed out that Roberts lack of clear thinking may have been caused by the medication he is taking for epilepsy. Could this be true?

The opinions of the Supreme Court in connection with this case lack cohesion.

[Kevmo]

Mike Savage pointed out that Roberts lack of clear thinking may have been caused by the medication he is taking for epilepsy.
***Well, there’s another possibility to chalk up in the WHY category. What will republicans do about it, what CAN they do about it? Practically nothing.