[freedomfiter2]

I just have a gut feeling that Roberts is playing a back game and his naysayers will be caught with their embarrassment showing.

A back game that involves unconstitutional rulings. He could have ruled that there are limits to the use of the interstate commerce clause, but he didn’t.

[KC Burke]

If that was the case he could have convinced one of the others that aren’t leftists. Didn’t happen.

There is no pony.

It is the Vision of the Warren Court all over again. It’s that simple. Some are made to ride — some are made to be ridden.

[LibLieSlayer]

What is it about a Chief SCOTUS Justice violating his oath of office, making rulings that go against the US Constitution, Legislating from the bench as a political activist and making decisions based upon a political chess board... being the highest from of treason a black robed jurist can commit... don't you people understand? Even if roberts was motivated in this decision based on some brilliant political game, it would disqualify him from holding office and he would not deserve to sit on any bench and should he tried for treason.

LLS