What did you find so illuminating?
From the "full article"
Note that this rejection of federal compulsion, which the four conservatives supported albeit in dissent, is the same one that the liberal legal establishment spent years deriding as frivolous and beyond debate: Of course Washington has carte blanche to do whatever it wants to do. "That is not the country the Framers of our Constitution envisioned," the Chief Justice writes, before going on to envision it himself by grounding the mandate in Congress's power to "lay and collect Taxes."
In other words, congress can compel anything action they want without having to call it a tax (the SCOTUS will do it for them) or the citing the commerce clause regulation of interstate commerce.
Thank you for the clarification. But it seems that the WSJ had no contribution to health care issue but their concern was with taxes, not surprising for them. As for limits on Congress, when they can draft me, give me a rifle and send me to France, Congress to require health insurance seems trifle. Another Congress can undo the AHC law whenever. As the old Brooklyn baseball fans said 'wait till next year'.