[The Free Engineer]

Under Robert’s theory, is there any limit on what government cannot coerce you into doing by making use of a tax?

Can they assign you a job and fine you $10K in taxes a month until you comply?

Can they limit you to one child per family?

WHERE IS THE LIMIT OF THIS POWER?

[quimby]

Eat your broccoli!

[saleman]

The limit on the power is the people we elect to office.

“Can they assign you a job and fine you $10K in taxes a month until you comply?”

Sure, why not? What Congress is gonna pass such a thing?

[A'elian' nation]

“WHERE IS THE LIMIT OF THIS POWER?”

The insidious tentacles of Roberts’ Rules can seep into our most basic rights - not just behaviors.

I don’t want to be a Methodist (no offense to Methodists), will I have to pay $10K to be a non-Methodist? Will we all have to pay $10K to be a non-atheist? You haven’t lost your freedom of religion so long as you can pay for it.
You name any God-given right, and this applies.

The government is now the mafia. All taxes have become protectionist monies.

Not only is there no limit to this taxing power, Roberts has made the Supreme Court superfluous if it no longer weighs on the constitutionality of a bill, and its only purpose is to find a way to legitimize anything Congress passes.

The only act Roberts Rules has declared unconstitutional is the Magna Carta.

[Waymore Gimmie]

I think what Roberts is saying is that the Fed has unlimited powers of taxation, that taxation is controlled by the electorate, and that we the people should simply change the government if we don't agree with BHO and co.
(as in the upcoming elections)

Perhaps, we the people need to address this in a firm and binding way I.E. pass a constitutional admendment limiting the Fed's power of taxation, give aways, etc.

[The Unknown Republican]

No. We now need a Constitutional Amendment that expressly restricts the power of the Government to tax in-activity.