[uncbob]

It does matter

If it is a tax it is a tax no matter what they called it

But that doesn’t mean that there still weren’t aspects that weren’t unconstitutional —I would like to see arguments from that facet—in other words yes it is a tax but it is still unconstitutional because————————

Did Scalia present that rational in his dissent —I don’t know I am asking or did he say it wasn’t a tax

[LibLieSlayer]

roberts had NO AUTHORITY under his Constitutional powers to proclaim it as a tax... in fact... the SCOTUS never asked for or allowed the tax issue to be debated. He went outside of the decorum of the court and his Constitutional duties and legislated from the bench in violation of both the Constitution and his oath of office. That fact trumps any other argument period.

LLS