Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

“Gun confiscation”? Yes, for those who can’t afford the $50,000 gun tax. It’s perfectly within the power of the feds now.


18 posted on 06/28/2012 12:08:17 PM PDT by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: subterfuge
“Gun confiscation”? Yes, for those who can’t afford the $50,000 gun tax. It’s perfectly within the power of the feds now.

How about a conservative gun tax? The next conservative majority can enact or deem passed a penalty of $100 per year for anyone legally permitted to own firearms who does not possess a firearm of at least .38 cal, with compatible ammunition in the home. We can call it the Citizen Protection and Affordable Policing Act. Since unarmed citizens are a factor in increasing crime, this tax on a failure to participate in the firearms marketplace simply encourages them not to shift the costs of defending their lives and property onto other taxpayers. Since the fine is not so large as to be coercive, it's constitutional - Roberts, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan just said so! Ginsburg even wrote that the commerce clause would permit this regardless of the size of the fine if it's in what Congress decides is a good cause. [Note: I find this idea repulsive as serious legislation, but I'd love to see liberal heads explode when it's introduced in Congress.]

26 posted on 06/28/2012 3:45:08 PM PDT by Pollster1 (A boy becomes a man when a man is needed - John Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson