That's quite interesting. Since the Court decided the "individual mandate" was a tax, under the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), federal courts should not be hearing ObamaCare cases until it's fully implemented and someone pays a penalty in 2015. That's what the 4th Circuit found while two other Circuits believed AIA didn't apply to the mandate.
Bizarre.
"Since the Court decided the "individual mandate" was a tax, under the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA), federal courts should not be hearing ObamaCare cases until it's fully implemented and someone pays a penalty in 2015. That's what the 4th Circuit found while two other Circuits believed AIA didn't apply to the mandate."Completely astute, and also completely precluded by Robert's decision. It's moot, he's short-circuited that by remanding the decision in the present to Congress. 'Congress, it's a tax, do what thou wilt.'