Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: boxlunch
Thus is not advocating individual lawlessness, but

The lawlessness is in the existing government, all three branches.

Again, do we have enough people with righteous anger and courage to stand up against this?

No. Perhaps after a catastrophic event and a period of years of state-of-nature savagery, a useful number of righteous and brave individuals will rise out of the ashes. But right now we have virtually nothing but submitters, tolerators, enablers, collaborators...sheeple.

186 posted on 06/28/2012 7:01:05 AM PDT by Lady Lucky (God-issued, not govt-issued.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


I am out of the shower, please proceed.


188 posted on 06/28/2012 7:02:04 AM PDT by GRRRRR (He'll NEVER be my President, FUBO! Treason is the Reason! Impeach the Kenyan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: Lady Lucky

In Alvarez, the Ninth Circuit is affirmed. Per Kennedy. His opinion is for a plurality.

The statute violates the First Amendment. Breyer and Kagan concur and conclude that the Act as presently drafted fails First Amendment scrutiny. So Congress probably could rewrite it.


191 posted on 06/28/2012 7:02:40 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson