[muawiyah]

Ed's entrail readings seem spot on ~ and who would give up a chance to read his dissent from the bench ~ if he wanted to make it meaningful in the long run.

There is a possibility all the justices voted for the individual mandate as an excise tax (if it were rewritten as same) BUT only as an excuse to write all the other stuff out of existence in concurring opinions of severe complexity.

That'd get Ruthy's gizzard fur shur ~

[tennmountainman]

I agree. The mechanic’s of how the court works, is a much better indicator, than the oral arguements.
This writer seems to know the mechanic’s well.