Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sunmars

If we toss the word “Arizona” in the sentence in the article it says the majority of the people want the immigration laws enforced. THAT is what the Constitution is about, and that is what the SCOTUS ruled.

The Executive is NOT doing the job the Federal/Executive was created for. The only answer has been all along to impeach, but we don’t have enough “representatives” in government anymore. We have a majority of self serving pirates stuffing their pockets with perks/treasure they have voted for themselves at our expense, and defense of those perks at the expense of their fellow citizen, and country.


20 posted on 06/26/2012 3:51:38 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rockinqsranch

Isn’t declaring openly that one state will be treated differently than another a de facto, a priori violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause?


21 posted on 06/26/2012 4:00:54 AM PDT by relictele
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: rockinqsranch
Read Scalia’s opinion of what the SCOTUS did... hint... there are no Sovereign States.

LLS

27 posted on 06/26/2012 4:45:36 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Don't Tread On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson