Replies

The NY Times doesn't see the Tea Party now, yet it is there.

The NY Times did not see the Tea Party in November, 2010, yet it was there, as the electoral gutters ran red with blood of slaughtered liberal Democrats.

The NY Times will not see the Tea Party in November 2012, yet it will be there to decide the election. But the NYT will not see it.

The NYT will once again miss the greatest political news story of the past thirty years, all because it was right there in front of them, and they simply could not see it.

14 posted on 06/25/2012 2:38:08 PM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})

To: Milton Miteybad

But the NYT will not see it.

Along with the entire NBC Network. (Don't these corporations have stockholders anymore...?)

18 posted on 06/25/2012 2:41:28 PM PDT by Resettozero

To: Milton Miteybad

"..as the electoral gutters ran red with blood of slaughtered liberal Democrats.

+1 for that turn of phrase. Well done.

24 posted on 06/25/2012 2:52:52 PM PDT by SnuffaBolshevik (In a tornado, even turkeys can fly.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794