To: In Maryland
Scalia's opinion is compelling, it is probably also correct, but it is pretty much irrelevant in how the law now stands. The fact remains that the SCOTUS in a 6-2 decision agreed with my original statement.
So now that the compelling and probably correct argument of Scalia has failed to convince his peers, what do we do? I suggest as I did before that Brewer and several other states file suit against the Obama Administration.
I believe the grounds for a suit for non-enforcement AND for selective enforcement of duly enacted federal laws would provide a more compelling case for the SOTUS.
The Constitution charges the President and the Executive Branch with enforcing the laws as passed by Congress--the President is refusing to perform his duties and is in direct violation of both the intent and the word of the Constitution.
261 posted on
06/25/2012 11:24:41 AM PDT by
Sudetenland
(Member of the BBB Club - Bye-Bye-Barry!!! President Barack "Down Low" Obama)
To: Sudetenland
I believe the grounds for a suit for non-enforcement AND for selective enforcement of duly enacted federal laws would provide a more compelling case for the SOTUS. My thoughts exactly. Maybe some on the SC were inviting this action?
269 posted on
06/25/2012 11:48:00 AM PDT by
Dysart
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson