Ginzburg said there would be sharp disagreement in general not on healthcare, and we just got slaughtered on an Arizona law everyone thought would be upheld.
The “sharp disagreement” is Justice Scalia in dissent, and Ginzburg was very smug when she made her comment.
Oh dear Lord....
I didn’t think that the Arizona law would be upheld, and while I wish it were, I can see the SC’s point. If we want strong immigration law and regulation, we need to elect leaders who will implement that direction. Not have the states pass immigration laws that may be in violation of federal law.
However, nothing that happened today made me more or less pessimistic about the ruling on healthcare.
“everyone thought would be upheld.”
Hrm? Some of us when the law was issued predicted it would be found unconstitutional for precisely the reasons that Roberts stated.
Speak for yourself, sir. You do not speak for us.