Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilosopherStone1000
Immigration is a Federal concern, even if, as with Dumb0, he chooses not to enforce it. We need the laws in place and constitutional so the next person who becomes pres wont’ abuse his authority - whether at the Fed or State level.

Then it would seem sanctuary city and state practices should become a thing of the past, because they don't comport with Federal law.

300 posted on 06/25/2012 7:57:58 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]


To: ScottinVA

Absolutely.

And I believe that SCOTUS, if they ever hear a case regarding sanctuary cities, would vote to strike down those sanctuary laws as unconstitutional.

Can’t, at the moment, think of a situation where a SCOTUS case would arise, but it could happen.


308 posted on 06/25/2012 8:07:09 AM PDT by PhilosopherStone1000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

To: All

Who said: “ A country without borders is no country at all”.


315 posted on 06/25/2012 8:09:36 AM PDT by Fawn (DEAR JESUS....PLEASE LET OBAMA LOSE.....AMEN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson