Posted on 06/24/2012 7:47:10 PM PDT by Kaslin
He sure did
correcting tagline
And you need an ID to get into an Obama campaign rally or fundraiser.
democRATs don’t recognize ‘laws’.
Or they just ignore them.
But you Hispanos—do not get forks to eat with.
Shouldn’t that tell you something, Hispanos?
An ID was also required to get into a book signing by MOOOOCHELLE (Wide LOAD) Obama a few weeks back.
This is an example of liberals NEVER giving up.
Logic follows that if Indiana passes a voter ID law, and then that law goes to the Supreme Court, when the Court rules the law valid it allows ALL the other states can now to do the same.
Now Rosen is saying that these other states are "going to have to review them in the courts" too?
That's nonsense. The Court already reviewed it, and no more review is needed if more states which to follow Indiana.
-PJ
Yes I saw that, LOL.
But we didn't hear one Republican mention it on today's (Sunday's) shows not even FNS. They all (on those shows) think amnesty is the magic solution.
New day, same old crap.
Amnesty, Dream Act, etc etc are all totally meaningless if we do not close the borders first.
If you are Hispanic you cant use a fork at a Obama fund-raising dinner
Not to the Democrat party and progressives.
They mean millions of new liberal voters looking to big mommy government with hands out.
And RINOs are willing to accept that for a few short term votes. I call that the Rove strategy.
You need a photo ID to buy Sudafed at Walmart, but libs say it’s too much to ask for voting.
Maybe they want illegals to vote now rather than wait till amnesty is passed.
Extra BOLD DITTOs to that.
I really don't know what we should do with all the people here now, but the first step in any emergency is to first STOP THE BLEEDING.
We live in strange times.
For the life of me I can’t figure out what is contoversial about requiring voters to prove their citezenship when registering to vote and to present an ID when actually voting. The Dems arguments against such laws are so vacuous and manufactured, it’s insulting to listen to them. George Will did a pretty good job just enduring that wind bag, let alone having to deign himself to argue against her sophomoric points. I would have found an argument over whether the sun will rise tomorrow more intellectually stimulating.
The fact is, the Feds are going to lose the voter ID case in the supreme court. As Will said, they already lost it 2006. The Feds are also going to lose the Arizona illegal immigration case on the meritis. And, the Feds are going to lose the bulk if not all of the Obamacare case as well. Do they even have a copy of the constitution in the White House?
It is clear that Attorney General Holder is not a serious man. He’s a political hack using his office to help Obama score political points. And, by the way, why doesn’t Holder turn over all of his documents regarding Fast and Furious?
Like I said, we live in strange times.
Well, she’s right when she says we Republicans want to limit voters! But she fails to mention it is only voters who are NOT AUTHORIZED to vote whom we are trying to suppress. Democrats could never win if dead people and illegal aliens could not vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.