Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/22/2012 10:54:14 PM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: grundle

I thought the Sex Poodle was the godfather.


2 posted on 06/22/2012 10:58:58 PM PDT by Libloather (The epitome of civility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

He says that wind power isn’t sustainable...I don’t know about that, because right now, the town I live in is totally running off of wind power.

A brand new coal powered plant was built, and fired up just a few months ago, but right now, it’s not in use. I don’t know why, just that it isn’t, and our entire city is being run off of the wind turbines.

The coal plant they built replaced a gas powered electric station, but officials decided the cost of natural gas was too high. They were purchasing electricity from California..during the brown-outs back a few years ago when Cali supposedly was short of electricity. It was cheaper to purchase the power than it was to generate our own.

Wind is good in some areas, but not in others. I’m told that the power and resources it takes to keep building the replacement wings is more than what the machines generate. In some areas, they are being abandoned.

I think that blaming humans for the heating is wrong. There are other factors involved from space itself. The global heating is occurring on planets within our solar system, also.

It’s good to see this man speaking up as well he should. But, the damage is done with regard to global heating, and it’s costs to the wallets of those who have been involuntarily divested of $$.


4 posted on 06/22/2012 11:24:23 PM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Paul Ralph Ehrlich and the Population Bomb reduex


6 posted on 06/22/2012 11:25:27 PM PDT by NoLibZone (I trust Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney, Cain, Perry, Bachman : I trust their judgment on their 2012 pick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

/


7 posted on 06/22/2012 11:30:37 PM PDT by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle; steelyourfaith

BTTT!

Surely this news will be proclaimed far and wide in the press and on the prime time TV news.


8 posted on 06/22/2012 11:34:21 PM PDT by shove_it (just undo it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

This is great stuff. Unfortunately, the train has left Lovelock and
is bearing down on Reno. In other words too much money, time
and political scamming has been invested by the envirosocialists
to heed the caution of an old founding guru.


10 posted on 06/22/2012 11:38:59 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

He sounds like Rush Limbaugh. Glad he has the courage of his convictions


13 posted on 06/23/2012 2:32:01 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

1. There is no such thing as renewable energy. Energy used is energy expended forever.We don’t renew sunlight or wind every morning. Every morning we use sunlight that was not generated yesterday, nor wind that blew yesterday.

2. For the forseeable future, ie, decades, the predominant energy used in the United States will be coal, oil, nuclear and natural gas. Solar, wind, biofuel, fuel cells will be only a very small fraction of the energy pie. We have enough oil, coal, and natural gas to last us 150-300 years into the future at current usage rates. Compare this to the peak oil and natural gas scares of 1975 and 1980, when all that was predicted was doomsday for both those fuels. We are finding more today than ever.

3. For the longer term future, the dominant energies in America are natural gas and nuclear. Oil and coal will be minor players, but not for another 40-50 years.

Nuclear will be small scale, linked plants—scalable in nature, most likely thorium plants so no meltdown is possible. These plants will serve 25,000 homes or so, and be linked in series if necessary for larger areas. Natural gas will be used in converting vehicle and trucks, and for heating for more homes. Natural gas will also be used for electical generation instead of coal in more and more applications.

Nuclear has no carbon emissions and natural gas very little compared to alternative carbon based fuels, therefore green energy and global warming fanatics’ heads will explode with increasing regularity as this is realized.

The biggest polluters of the air, the coal burning plants in China and India, are never addressed by the watermelon heads, in their global warming claculations. It is just the evil United States and Europe that must cut back emissions or the Earth will die. The present generation of greenheads will long be dead before this Earth “dies”.

4. The energy outlook for America has never looked brighter. We can become self sufficient if we expend the will to do so. We have not done so yet solely because of the US government since 1974—almost 40 years. We will be able to export energy and energy products(ie oil, lubricants and refined gasoline)and generate tremendous amounts of capital for our nation.

5. The whole electric car thing is a flash in the pan. While the hybrid technologies of the Toyota Prius type cars can be useful and make some economic sense, plug in electric vehicles will always suffer range limitations, and for now, they are essentially high priced coal powered cars that make no economic sense, taking about 29 years to break even on the additional costs over gasoline powered vehicles. In 1918, a Detroit Electric could get you about 40 miles on its battery. Today, the Chevy Volt, over 90 years later ,gets you about——40 miles in range before it switches over to gas. Dual fuel cars—natural gas and gasoline—will start appearing on the market in the 2013 model year. Plug in electric cars will become items of puzzlement in museums in the future as in “what were we they thinking?”

6. The amount of money the Obama Administration wasted on “green energy” is criminal, and it was deliberately directed to political operatives as slush funds, knowing full well these companies could never be economically “sustainable”. It was failure by a design with the sole purpose of providing a cover for the transfer of OUR money to certain individuals. The truth of all this will surface someday.

7. Your part this year in providing energy for your future is to engage people when they talk nonsense about energy and global warming, in order to stop the development of nuclear natural gas, oil and coal. Let the greenies go find an island somewhere and practice safe energy. In a few years they will be extinct. In the meantime we will be leading productive and comfortable lives thanks to our developed and abundant energy supplies.


14 posted on 06/23/2012 2:51:58 AM PDT by exit82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Lovelock’s invention of the electron capture detector in 1957 first enabled scientists to measure CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) and other pollutants in the atmosphere, leading, in many ways, to the birth of the modern environmental movement.

And I would say another tool in the bag of wildly unproven tools used to further the “agenda”


17 posted on 06/23/2012 5:01:34 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

As he puts it, “so-called ‘sustainable development’ … is meaningless drivel … We rushed into renewable energy without any thought. The schemes are largely hopelessly inefficient and unpleasant. I personally can’t stand windmills at any price.”

Worse than meaningless drivel, it could be classed as a very very expensive deception. and that my friends is a criminal enterprise worthy of criminal prosecution for anyone invested in the scheme.

...and speaking of renewables a word that has been hijacked as a part of the big deception. Who is it that is the father of what is and isn’t supposedly renewable? My contention is the so called fossil fuels are just as renewable as wind or solar or any of the others so classed, and they are much cheaper, available, reliable, sustainable, and on and on.

Last but certainly not least, this: “One thing that being a scientist has taught me is that you can never be certain about anything. You never know the truth. You can only approach it and hope to get a bit nearer to it each time. You iterate towards the truth. You don’t know it.”

is patent BEE ESS and begets the ability of the scientist, the man on the street, pick a person, to divorce themselves from reality, which is man CAN know and and indeed MUST know, that is what separates him from those and that over which God gave him dominion.

The bottom line could be this. Environuts are cowards, blaming one of God’s creations, instead of God himself, for the perceived careless and poorly planned construction of earth, which the father of us all provided for our habitation for as long as HE sees fit for it to remain such.


20 posted on 06/23/2012 5:36:24 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

This has got to be a huge blow to the greenies’ morale.


22 posted on 06/23/2012 5:48:06 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Sunlight and wind are indeed free - just like the coal, oil, gas and (uranium) below your feet. Converting sunlight and wind into consumable energy is extremely expensive.

The object of energy production is to obtain, store and transport that fuel or energy to the final user. In this regard, solar and wind “power” is simply not feasible on a grand scale in our lifetime, if ever, unless you legislate the other sources out of existence.


24 posted on 06/23/2012 7:37:27 AM PDT by Lowcountry (RIP: Peterdanbrokaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

“so-called ‘sustainable development’ … is meaningless drivel

It’s the ‘law’ here .. Thanks to aRnie, Moonbeam, the
NRDC, Sierra Club, thug unions, and many more too stupid to balance their checkbooks much less understand science.. but they can roll a joint in their sleep.


25 posted on 06/23/2012 9:32:10 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

26 posted on 06/23/2012 7:01:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Occupy DC General Assembly: We are Marxist tools. WE ARE MARXIST TOOLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Toronto Sun poll at the link:

Poll
Do you think global warming is a real threat?

6%
Yes

475 votes

92%
No

7705 votes

3%
It won’t be my problem

221 votes


27 posted on 06/23/2012 7:06:35 PM PDT by samtheman (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/21/obamas-socialist-designs/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson