"The article offers a reason that Obama officials distanced themselves from the paid protesters: while both sides enjoy a good, loud demonstration, its generally acknowledged that paying people to protest is a form of cheating which explains why the Obama campaign was quick to distance themselves from the group
1 posted on
06/22/2012 3:25:03 PM PDT by
djone
To: djone
2 posted on
06/22/2012 3:31:19 PM PDT by
Doogle
(((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
To: djone
Who pays them? Got a mirror? Or mommy’s and daddy’s trust fund does.
3 posted on
06/22/2012 3:32:09 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Bill Ayers Was *Not* "Just Some Guy In The Neighborhood")
To: djone
4 posted on
06/22/2012 3:35:49 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
To: djone
Mormans handle hecklers much better than Obama's people!
I thought I would never say it...but GO MITT!
To: djone
"The article offers a reason that Obama officials distanced themselves from the paid protesters: while both sides enjoy a good, loud demonstration, its generally acknowledged that paying people to protest is a form of cheating which explains why the Obama campaign was quick to distance themselves from the group If you were caught paying demonstrators, you would distance yourself from them too.
Its going to be some combination of Soros/ACORN/stimulus money. Its all the same crowd. The various org names are just how they fuzz up the org chart and fuzz the origins of the money. Makes it sound like there are hundreds of independent organizations out there when they all answer to the same puppeteers and get their money from the same trough.
6 posted on
06/22/2012 5:21:10 PM PDT by
marron
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson