Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joe fonebone

He’s lucky he’s not need the services of a defense attorney himself. What you described, while maybe something we’d all like to do, is pretty stupid.

Jurors are there to listen to the evidence and render a verdict based on that evidence, not to determine what pleas a defendant can and cannot make.


12 posted on 06/22/2012 12:26:32 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: dmz

Jurors are there to listen to the evidence and render a verdict based on that evidence, not to determine what pleas a defendant can and cannot make.

A Juror has the power to, and is to, judge anything and everything having to do with the case they are on the jury for. That includes chewing out the judge or prosecutor if that is what they deserve. Not that a judge would ever let you know that or fail to find you in contempt.


51 posted on 06/22/2012 5:58:51 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson