Replies

Because education is a huge part of enculturation, I have serious misgivings about the ability of foreign institutions to produce what for lack of a better term I will call "finished Americans." We have enough difficulty with the leftists in our domestic institutions, and I fail to see how predominately 3rd world professors (as you must know they will be, labor costs being what they are) will be less hostile to Western civilization than their US counterparts. So I question the value of what we will ultimately be getting beyond the educational equivalent of cheap, commoditized Chinese crap at Walmart and empty US industrial sites. Maybe it will work differently this time, but I am not hopeful.

It also sounds like a great way to slowly offshore the last vestiges of US research institutions (hey, MIT probably would be cheaper at Chennai) while producing a new generation of people at home who view themselves increasingly as "Citizens of the world." And they are of no use; I have never met a self-described COTW that was not an absolutely flaming internationalist lefty. The market is great for setting the value of fungible commodity items, but I don't view an education as such. Mere technical training, sure, but education is broader, and I think properly imparted it serves to reinforce a sense of nationhood in our young adults.

Sure more choices are better, right up until they lead to fewer choices, as has happened with the decimation of whole swaths of American industry. I suppose some people don't mind seeing highway bridges and national monuments being imported, but it smells of civilizational gangrene to me. Furthermore, just because something is "market driven" doesn't mean it is beneficial or even benign. The market drove captive human labor in America (still does in some places). True, it may eventually have ended the practice when slave maintenance grew expensive enough by comparison to other means, but still. I guess we just fundamentally disagree.