[napscoordinator]

This was a no brainer. Seriously mandatory funds taken from pay checks for union???? Never should have gotten beyond first court room. Total waste of time for everyone. I could have easily ruled on this case with ZERO legal background.

[evad]

"This was a no brainer."

And yet 2 of those boneheads dissented.

[Peet]

 This was a no brainer. Seriously mandatory funds taken from
 pay checks for union???? Never should have gotten beyond
 first court room. Total waste of time for everyone. I could
 have easily ruled on this case with ZERO legal background.

What? You think that freedom of association thing means something?

Liberals don't. You can take that to the bank.

I once recieved my two-weeks notice, initiated by the union because I refused to sign the payroll deduction. A call to the personnel office confirmed that, yes, they WOULD fire me because "it is in the contract" and "our hands are tied."

[I typed what I think of unions here, but deleted it. The only acceptable words in it were "communist," "whorehouse," and "Tijuana" and I'm not sure those are OK.]

[Rome2000]

Seriously mandatory funds taken from pay checks for union????

This case does nothing to stop that very practice that occurs today in all forced union states.

You don't pay dues, you don't work, period.

This case was about an ADDITIONAL amount of money on top of dues that was being extorted to fund communist politicians campaigns in California.