Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diggity

” BTW, why don’t you link where a court has officially defined what a NBC citizen is.”

That’s easy...Minor v Happersett USSC defines NBC. Look it up youself, you might learn something. The definition of Natural Born Citizen, until Obama, has never an issue. It was always understood and accepted that children born in this country to citizen parents were the so called Natives / Natural Born Citizens. They form the very foundation of any society.

What has been an issue is what other (ie non NBC) circumstances of birth resulted in “born citizenship.”

The 14th Amendment was passed to insure citizenship for former slaves and their children, partially answered the question of who shall be a “born” citizen. (Note: Born citizens have No need for naturalization.)

USSC case WKA applied the 14th amendment to persons other than the initially intended former slaves and their children. WKA, born in the US to non citizen, but legally residing parents, was found to be a born citizen by the application of the 14th namendment.

**********************************

“Why don’t you try though since you like to argue about things you don’t understand.”

LOLOLOLOL.... That is funny coming from you!

ta ta sonny!


116 posted on 06/20/2012 4:48:03 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: Forty-Niner

How many times to I have to explain to you morons that the question is about Mitt’s father being born in Mexico and not about Mitt being born in the USA.

I guess you don’t understand that. Jackass. Figures though.


117 posted on 06/20/2012 5:39:44 PM PDT by Diggity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson