Q. And is – - are you of any financial means where you can assist in those costs?
A. Uhrn, not- – not that I’m aware of. …
Assuming Mark O'Malley was her questioner here, was this the answer he expected her to give? Was it one he rehearsed with her? Had she kept their financing from him?
Gaaaah! One needs a regular filled-out Daytimer to follow the irregularities and their occurrences in this affair. Good account here. Thanks!
The sad thing here is that these questions may very well have been his way of finding out as well. Had he even broached the subject of the Paypal account with them before the hearing?? If not, then why not???
One would have thought that since bailbond testimony is different and has to be full and without omission of any kind, that O'Mara should have and would have advised his client[s] accordingly before the hearing. And the Paypal money has to be in a Trust account by Florida Law. Did he advise them of that. He may have, but then again, he is not and was not Shelly's counsel, just George's -- a sad fact that she now realizes as she searches for one of her own.
“Assuming Mark O’Malley was her questioner here, was this the answer he expected her to give? Was it one he rehearsed with her? Had she kept their financing from him?”
Their attorney must know better than to engage himself in perjury, so my best guess is that GZ and SZ *never* told him about the large sum of donated cash.