Nothing said was incriminating. They talked about which bills to pay.
Same old routine: evidence relesed, inflamatory headline written, then none of the evidence supports the media assumptions in the headline.
He was clear from the first day that some of that initial defense fund was going to be used for personal expenses. Nothing quoted in the article has any relevance to the wife’s perjury charge. And, there’s absolutely nothing unusual about someone who’s the recipient of hundreds of death threats deciding to purchase bulletproof vests. Apparently the MSM is “outraged” that he refused to make himself an easy victim. Come to think of it, that’s been their complaint all along.