.
Posted on 06/16/2012 4:23:11 AM PDT by safetysign
Romney is a liberal. I won’t vote for him.
Five...four...three......
Broken record. Obama is thrilled.
Yep, you can count on it.
I used to think the same...Romney’s too liberal...but at this point I’d vote for Daffy Duck over the current POTUS.
Yesterday our commender in chief once again trashed the Constitution with his announcement about illegal aliens.
This guy is dangerous...Romney is only annoying.
He’s a bottom feeder.
What’s irrational about looking at the man’s record and throwing your hands up in the air?
Do you like Massachusetts Mitt’s activist judge picks?
Do you like his global warming?
Do you like his gun grabbing?
Do you like his increases in taxes *COUGH* I mean fees?
How about his sanctuary cities?
The entirety of his record as governor is liberal.
Just because I can’t stand Obama’s record, doesn’t mean I’m going to be blind to Romney’s. And Romneys is indeed _that bad_, that he can’t be supported.
Romney’s presidency is the easiest/biggest clusterf____ to see coming. Nothing about his candidacy is real. He is Obama white.
Mr. RomneyCARE has ALREADY supported Obama on
RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE, TARP, and now Amnesty.
Weak Mr. RomneyCARE is NOTHING but a democrat
liberal.
Obama probably is thrilled. Romney isn’t going to keep any of his promises, what part of the Rockefeller wing of the republican party have you missed over the last 4-9 decades?
Everybody that Romney keeps surrounding himself with puts the lie to all of his promises. You know full well that if you were the one running for president against Obamacare, you wouldn’t hire not one person who favored Obamacare.
Romney has hired every single one of them.
Obama is a marxist. I won’t vote for him.
In fact, I’m even going to vote for the other guy in order to help keep the marxist out. The other guy is no conservative - but he’s no marxist either - and he likes America... the marxist?... not so much.
I don’t want to have to explain how my choice to fail to support the other guy led to the further destruction of America by aiding the marxist’s reelection. Not many FReepers do.... unless they just sign up before elections to disrupt.
————————This guy is dangerous...Romney is only annoying.-——————
This is naive.
Both men are progressives. That makes them both dangerous.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDJEc92d38&feature=player_embedded
Just Sayin'...
-——————In fact, I’m even going to vote for the other guy in order to help keep the marxist out.-———————
Do you believe that “progressive” is code word for communist like Allen West does?
Mitt Romney in 2002 “My views are progressive”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMcjJEXt9To
If you answer the question with a yes, then you are prepared to vote for one communist over another.
.
The late break. In most presidential elections, undecided voters break in large numbers for the challenger. If someone is undecided about an incumbent they know well, they will usually cast their ballot for the challenger
In Ohio independents out number the two parties. So Zero is dead.
I'm with you - ANYTHING to get rid of Obama. On his worst day, Romney is better than Obama on his "best" day.
Here’s what I want to explain to my kids:
I learned my lesson.
I won’t pick and choose between progressives and say that one progressive is better than another progressive.
The way post 11 is structured, it sounds oh-so-reasonable.
But if you just change the words “the other guy” to be “progressive” (which Romney is, he admits it and his record bears the words out to be the full honest truth) that’s when the reasonability of post 11 falls apart.
If anybody believes as Allen West does, that “progressive” is code word for “communist”, then they have no business voting for Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.