[Fred Nerks]

Let me try to explain what really tricks me, the images I post are available throughout the web, Google Images has them all over and over again. WHY do freepers rely only on images from articles with vested interests? Why does no one go to the trouble of downloading and saving a number of images of the same person, so that they can satisfy themselves that what they are looking at isn't something presented to suit the particular piece of mis-information the various articles/videos/webpage is peddling?

I have now repeatedly attempted to explain where the erotic images of that model came from, the website and ID number was shown on one of them, the images came from free-vintage-porn.com which website has now been wiped clean and closed down. I found that YEARS AGO. Why did no one else bother to use the information on the images to trace them, WHILE THE SITE WAS STILL UP? Nice opportunity for someone making a video to buy the website, close it down and present the images as a new discovery. He found them amongst the archives of Frank Marshall Davis' articles, says he?

...and then he found a piece of wood...I'm cracking up here.

[Exmil_UK]

I think you underestimate the number of dirty old men who keep these kinky mags for generations. I would not be surprised in the least if the website just scanned original magazines.

Unlike old newspapers, these things get kept :-)

In terms of needing to see the original source magazines, I agree, only the original physical copies are of any true legal value for evidence.

[little jeremiah]

The only way to get past the stuff you describe is for a person to sort of mentally clear out anything they think they “know” and then re-read a bunch of research threads.

Then the light goes on.