Posted on 06/14/2012 10:01:13 PM PDT by Perseverando
I disagree. This is a result of looking too hard to try to find a difference that just isn’t there.
You don’t like the message and you’re blaming the messenger.
Stanley Ann Dunham did NOT have a sexual relationship with a black man 35 years older than her. YOU DON’T KNOW WHO THE MOTHER OF ZERO IS AND IT BOTHERS YOU.
Nonsense. All I’m doing is comparing pictures that have been posted. This has nothing to do with the deflections you’re bringing up.
SHOW ME. SHOW ME a ‘deflection’.
Show me with IMAGES. Don’t refer back to something I posted with nothing but WORDS which is what is confusing to others reading this thread.
SHOW ME THE IMAGE - and when you SHOW ME, then tell me what it is that you disagree with. It’s far too easy to write and say ‘those two images are the same’ when there’s NOTHING ON THE COMMENT. Without the image itself, JUST WHO IS GUILTY OF DEFLECTION?
This is quite a meltdown. I haven’t said the images are the same. The deflection was this: “Stanley Ann Dunham did NOT have a sexual relationship with a black man 35 years older than her. YOU DONT KNOW WHO THE MOTHER OF ZERO IS AND IT BOTHERS YOU.” YOUR images show a woman with several features that are similar. This notion that it can’t be the same woman is nonsense.
Your offtopic stalking is exposing you as a desperate fool. You shuodl read and discuss the article this thread is dedicated instead of spamming it with offtopic ad hominem.
The article provides tons of evidence that Stanley Anne Dunham was naked and creating amateur porn 8 months before Zero's birth.
Why don't you address the copious evidence in the topic article instead of spreading leftist snopes disinformation and ad hominem?
As of now, your behavior is your admission of your ignorance -- unless of course it is indicative of something more diabolical.
* The article provides tons of evidence that Stanley Anne Dunham was naked and creating amateur porn with Frank Marshall Davis 8 months before Zero’s birth.
It’s not a matter of a notion I have, it’s simply a matter of it NOT being the same woman that I have shown in profiles.
The young woman on the left is Stanley Ann Dunham, the woman on the right is THE MODEL and they are not the same person.
And why won’t you post the image with your argument? Show me. I want to see your identification of them both UNDERNEATH OR ABOVE THE IMAGE COMPOSITION.NOT JUST WORDS.
Post the image, identify them, and let the readers make up own minds ACCORDING TO WHAT THEY CAN SEE.
thanks Phil, I’m about to make another composite using a couple of images some kind Freeper sent me. I’ll ping you.
There’s not much more I can do but try to show them, THE MODEL isn’t Stanley Ann Dunham, but it seems images don’t make any difference, those who want to believe Stanley Ann went to bed with Frank Marshall Davis and produced zero, will cling to it for ever, evidence to the contrary regardless.
"They tell you a beautiful story--it isn't the truth, but it is beautiful nonetheless."
Once upon a time there was a little high school girl aged seventeen from Kansas, and she was seduced by an old coloured man in Hawaii, a communist journalist who took erotic photographs of her, which he sold to porno websites and magazines, and when she became pregnant to him, they packed her off to Kenya to have the baby and lied and said that a foreign student from the village of Kogelo was the father, all to protect the old pervert journalist and her Bank Vice President mother. And they named the boy after the kenyan, who went to Harvard and didn't know about it all until he received divorce papers in 1964, on which he discovered that some child had been named after him...and now that little boy is President of the United States of America.
How is that for a beautiful story that isn't true?
Well, it looks like Miss Model has light colored eyes (which was pointed out on another thread some days ago) and SAD’s are brown. Miss Model has a mole on her cheek (darkened in one shot, but left natural in the other) and SAD does not. Miss Model isn’t Marcy Moore either because Marcy Moore has a mole on the opposite cheek from Miss Model. Also, Marcy Moore has moles and/or large freckles scattered across her chest in other poses, but those don’t show up on Miss Model’s full photos. I think we’re dealing with three different people here.
Thanks for posting these pics, Fred.
Sorry, but there's simply no way to make such a determination on the basis of these two photos. It's one thing to disagree, but there's nothing definitive from what has been presented.
Many features indicate we are looking at two different women.With mouth closed the placement of the lips/mouth between the nose and chin is dramatically different. At the left, proportional; in the center, mouth drawn to the nose foreshortening the upper lip, presenting a long and pointed chin.
Leading to the overall shape difference: at the left proportional; at the center, quite elongated: thin and tall.
The nostrils at the center noticeably asymmetrical; in both right and left, symmetrical.
The ears on right and left tilt in at the bottom; in the center, pendulous--reflecting the father, Stanley Armour Dunham.
One is a model; the other, a future bank officer.
Bingo ... but these folks aren’t playing, they’re seriously trying to establish the newest fake scenario of the pix equal Stanley thus FMD is the likely bio donor. But the essence of the exercise is that the Kenayan bigamist is the legal father of record thus little barry bastard commie is not an NBC.
Apparently someone found the vintage porn site with a model who bears resemblance to SAD and ran with it, for an obvious agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.