[Chgogal]

In general I agree with you. But (sorry) there will be very few exceptions. And I would definitely never say no to talent and will. There will be a few women (like 1% - a stat pulled out of my @$$t) who can handle the physical part. Yeah, no kidding. Take me for example, after 10 plus years of competitive swimming, gee, I could handle the backpack trek at 13,000 ft (better than all the males except for one), handle long hikes (30 miles in one day at 13 years of age), etc. Also, when I was just a sophomore in high school I out did the senior guys and maxed out the underwater competition. They were mortified. Now, I am the first to admit that I have no interest in killing a man with my bare hands. I'd rather cook a gourmet meal and arrange flowers, again no kidding. Therefore, I should never apply for Special Forces. But I don't think it is wise to say “never” to talent and will, wherever it is found.

So, in short I agree with you but then again I don't. ; ) I know just like a woman. Can't make up my mind.

[ansel12]

All you described was a fit, athletic girl, a long, long ways from being able to meet the demands of Special Operations requirements.

[rlmorel]

I know what you are saying. On one hand, I could almost say “If a woman can handle the physical part, let her in...” but it is even more than just being able to haul equipment at 13,000 feet for 10 miles.

I am concerned with facets such as logistical considerations. In situations where a very small amount of something can mean the difference between success and failure, the overhead of having even a small change in the logistical chain to accommodate females in a largely male environment can be enough to impact the overall outcome. Kind of the kingdom being lost for want of a nail.

Sigh. It is difficult to even discuss this subject without being perceived as disrespectful towards women. For me, it is nothing of the sort.