[Paladin2]

Not if they are ‘rats.

[TexasCajun]

Obamah can always declassify the already leaked material and that's dat!

...especially if he's the one that ordered the leak to try to make himself look better.

[TexasCajun]

No, all the leaked material will be declassified before Obamah goes home to Chicago.

[null and void]

Poison Photo-Drop .. decision to release photographs .. will imperil nation .. its defenders.

Tue May 12 09:52:58 2009 · 13 of 21
null and void to Sergeant Tim

Before he is done I fully expect him to release the names, addresses and phone numbers of anyone anywhere in the world who has ever provided any information to agency workers.

The damage to US intel will last multiple generations.

[Tex-Con-Man]

By releasing info about Osama’s raid 10 minutes after it happened, the idiot Prez dramatically diminished the quality of the intel we got. Dumbass couldn't keep his mouth shut even for 2 weeks.

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

No. Heads in Iran will roll, however. Between disclosing OBL’s doctor and ‘W.S.-friendly workers’ in Iranian Nuke sites, THE UNITED STATES WILL NEVER AGAIN GET ANY FOREIGN AGENT TO HELP US AND THAT IS OBAMA’S MISSION HERE, TO CASTRATE UNCLE SAM AND SEVERELY IMPACT OUR FUTURE INTELLIGENCE GATHERING CAPABILITIES. Well done, Obama! /s

[radioone]

This movie, by the time it comes out, will not change a single vote.

[GeorgeWashingtonsGhost]

Wouldn’t surprise me if Biden is the leaky faucet rat, and not Donilon. Biden ‘outed’ that is was SEAL Team 6 that did the raid and knowing 0bama, Biden probably finds out everything he asks about, cleared or not. I’d look at Biden because he’s already proven himself to eagerly want to sell out the United States for his own 15 friggin’ minutes of fame. He should be in Levenworth along with 0bama and Holder.

[Hoodat]

Will heads roll? Heads have already rolled.

Iran 'arrests 12 CIA agents'

American spies outed; CIA suffers in Lebanon

[MarkL]

And what about the deaths of all those SEAL team 6 operators on a helicopter that was shot down? And let's not forget the (I believe it was a Saudi) double agent who brought in the "new" underpants bomb... Thanks to that news report, you can bet LOTS of people have been tortured and/or killed, as well as losing an ally's important intelligence asset, making sure we'd never get anything else from his or her.

But then, Obama would rather kill terrorists than actually try to gain intelligence from then when captured.

It's really frightening how cavalier the Obama regime is when it comes to national security!

Mark

[MasterGunner01]

Nothing will be done because that would require a spine and cajones that only a microscopic few of the DC Republicans have. The majority will be complicit in Obama’s treason.

[C210N]

who wrote of the origins and operation of a secret U.S-Israeli cyberwar strike on Iran's uranium enrichment plant at Natanz.

What's this about? Is it the secret U.S. operation to make believe the U.S. developed and let Israel use the Stuxnet virus that Israel itself conceived/developed/deployed?

[af_vet_rr]

We may have disrupted Natanz for months, but we also revealed to Iran and the world our cyberwar capabilities. And we became the first nation to use cyberwar weapons on a country with which we are not at war.

Somebody is conveniently forgetting that China and Russia and other countries have been hammering away at our infrastructure. Sure they were mostly trying to get secret information (which should never have been accessible to the internet anyways) instead of trying to actively manipulate systems tied to things like our nuclear systems, but it's really not a big leap from trying to crack our computer security to actually doing something with it.

If we have a right to attack Iran's nuclear facilities like Natanz and Bushehr that are under U.N. supervision, does Iran have a right to attack our nuclear plants, like Three Mile Island, with cyberwar viruses they create?

Three Mile Island has nothing to do with US weapons production. Bad analogy. Plus there are no "rights" in open warfare as far as whether one side is allowed to target certain facilities but the other side isn't. When you go to war with somebody, you should automatically assume they are going to target your country if they can.

It's very dangerous to assume that they can't reach you. We have grown very soft because we have two oceans on either side, and a nation to the north that is just as interested in keeping the baddies out, but God help us if somebody made a serious effort to get something into Mexico and then on into Texas or California. We have a lot of Coast Guard and Navy ships operating up and down the coasts between the US/Mexico border and South America, doing interdiction, but they can't catch everything.

I'm honestly surprised nothing serious happened after we went to war with Iraq, but Iraq was a shell of itself compared to 1991. Eventually we're going to have a President get us into an undeclared war with somebody who is going to strike back at the mainland US.